The range of plausible dates for the Passover at Jesus’ death as proposed by credible 20th and 21st century academic scholars, are 30, 31, and 33 CE with Nisan 14 (Passover) falling on either a Wednesday or Friday. There are no serious alternatives.
The general literature, for the last two or three centuries, show a confusing range of dates partially due to writers using assorted calendars, variant attempts to shorten the length of Jesus’ 3½ year ministry, and different exegetical analyses of the feast described in Matthew 12:1-8; Mark 2:23-28; and Luke 6:1-5.
While the Gospel accounts do not convey specific dates for the birth and death of Jesus of Nazareth, they provide sufficient chronological detail to determine the years of those events (for the details of the birth of Jesus of Nazareth in 4 BCE see The Real Christmas Story). As to the Crucifixion, there are sufficient data to place the exact day and even the hour. The setting is the 3½ year ministry of Jesus including four identifiable Passovers in the Gospels, the 1st (Luke 6:1, Matthew 21:12; Mark 11:15; John 2:14-15); the second (John 5:1-47 inferred in context with Luke 6:1-5; Mark 2:23-28; Matthew 2:1-8.); the third (John 2:3; 11:55); and the fourth (John 12:12-14, Mark 14:22-26).
CE Julian | Year AM | Nisan 14 Passover on Hebrew Perpetual Calendar | Nisan 14 Passover on the Babylonian Calendar (Parker & Dubberstein) | Nisan 14 in the Essene Jubilees Calendar |
26 | 3786 | Fri., Mar. 22 | Sun., Apr. 21 | Wed., Apr. 10 |
27 | 3787 | Wed., Apr. 9 | Thu., Apr. 10 | Wed., Apr. 9 |
28 | 3788 | Mon., Mar. 29 | Wed., Apr. 28 | Wed., Apr. 7 |
29 | 3789 | Sat., Apr. 16 | Mon., Apr. 18 | Wed., Apr. 6 |
30 | 3790 | Wed., Apr. 5 | Fri., Apr. 7 | Wed., Apr. 5 |
31 | 3791 | Mon., Mar. 26 | Wed., Apr. 25 | Wed., Apr. 11 |
32 | 3792 | Mon., Apr. 14 | Mon., Apr. 14 | Wed., Apr. 9 |
33 | 3793 | Fri., Apr. 3 | Sat., May 2 | Wed., Apr. 8 |
34 | 3794 | Wed., Mar. 22 | Thu., Apr. 22 | Wed., April 7 |
Traditional dates for the Crucifixion are Fri., April 7, 30 CE (a general Protestant approach) and Fri., April 3, 33 CE (a Roman Catholic approach). The former relies on the Babylonian Calendar (set by observation of the new moon at Babylon in Mesopotamia). The latter relies on the Hebrew Perpetual Calendar as administered by the Aaronic priests not the Pharisees of Herodian times. The year 31 CE is understood by some as the year of the Crucifixion, but the Babylonian Calendar places the date on Wed., April 25, 31 CE and the Hebrew Perpetual Calendar 30 days later on Iyyar 14.
So it seems, the calendar dates as set forth above are not of much help. What we can do is to examine additional data to narrow down the timeframe. Let us consider seven major events that point specifically to the year of Jesus’ death.
1. The Sanhedrin Expelled from the Hewn Stone-Chamber
On Av 9, 3830 AM (Sat., Aug. 4, 70 CE) Jerusalem fell to the Romans on the weekly Sabbath. On that morning, priestly course 24 (Maaziah) completed its service with the morning sacrifice. Course 1 (Jehoiarib) reported for duty as they had charge of the evening sacrifice that Sabbath (Jerusalem Talmud, Taanit 4:5 [24a]).
According to the Babylonian Talmud, “Forty years before the destruction of the Temple, the Sanhedrin were exiled and took up residence in Hanuth” (Sanhedrin 41:2); (Epstein, Tractate Sanhedrin, 1987); (Avodah Zara 8:b); (Epstein, 1988). In Herodian times, the meeting place of the Sanhedrin when functioning as a court, was the Hewn Stone-Chamber or Hall of the Hewn Stone (לשכת הגזית, Lishkat ha-Gazit) built into the north wall of the Temple (Tractate Sanhedrin 10.2); (Danby, 1933, p. 399); (Danby, 1919, p. 67); (Neusner, 2005, pp. 453, 462-463).
Forty years before the Romans destroyed the Temple, in the sacred year 70Ni/71Ni CE (which began in 3830 AM), the veil of the temple was torn in two (Luke 23:44-45 NASB) and the Chamber suffered significant structural damage from the earthquake occurring at Jesus’ death. Hebrew University archaeologist Benjamin Mazar identified the hanuyot with the Royal Stoa, a structure of massive columns erected by Herod the Great, at the southern end of his expansion of the Temple Mount. (Mazar B., 1975, p. 126).
Abandoning the Hewn Stone-Chamber, the Sanhedrin moved to the Royal Stoa. The Babylonian Talmud states that God expelled the Sanhedrin:
Forty years before the Temple was destroyed, the Sanhedrin was exiled from the chamber [of Hewn Stones] of the Temple to a store.
Tractate Sanhedrin at Sabbat 15a); Rodkinson, Tractate Sanhedrin, 1903, p. 121; Rodkinson, 1918, p. 121.
The William Davidson Talmud at Rosh ha-Shanah 31a reads:
From the Chamber of Hewn Stone, its fixed seat in the Temple, to Ḥanut, literally, shop, a designated spot on the Temple Mount outside the Temple proper.
Rosh ha-Shanah 31a.
What this means is that the displacement of the Sanhedrin from the Chamber of Hewn Stones because of earthquake damage took place in the sacred year 30Ni/31Ni CE (beginning in 3791 AM) at the time the veil of the temple was torn in two (Luke 23:44-45 NASB). These data show the damage to the Chamber of Hewn Stones happened in 31 CE at the time of the Crucifixion, forty years before the Roman destruction of the Temple in 70Ti/71Ti CE (3831 AM), thereby confirming the year of Jesus’ death in 31 CE and ruling out both 30 and 33 CE as the year of the Crucifixion.
2. The Fifteenth Year of Tiberius
Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus (63 BCE-14 CE) was the first emperor of the Roman Empire. He ruled from 27 BCE until his death in 14 CE. In 27 BCE, the Senate awarded him the honorific “the revered one” and consequently he became Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus. On February 5, 2 BCE, when Augustus reached the age of 60, the Roman Senate declared him Pater Patriae, a Latin honorific meaning “Father of the Fatherland.”
In the first half of 13 CE, Augustus appointed Tiberius co-princeps, with powers equal to his own, as emperor in order to ensure continuity without an interregnum or upheaval, in the event of his death. Princeps was a title meaning chief or first man which Augustus had carefully crafted for himself. Augustus died August 19, 14 CE (767 AUC).
Only months prior to his death, Augustus conferred on Tiberius all powers that were invested in him as Roman Emperor, in all provinces, as co-princeps (Mommsen, 1996, p. 114). Tiberius was, in effect, co-princeps with Augustus. According to Jann Tibbetts, a military sciences researcher,
in AD 13, the powers held by Tiberius were made equal, rather than second, to Augustus’ own powers, he was for all intents and purposes a “co-princeps” with Augustus, and in the event of the latter’s passing, would simply continue to rule without an interregnum or possible upheaval.
Tibbetts, 2016.
The sense co-princepts is that between them they discharged the duties of the Roman chief of state. Rick Lanser, a staff member of the Associates for Biblical Research, in his article “What was the “Fifteenth Year of Tiberius”? explains:
Although the Romans recorded Tiberius as sole head of state beginning in AD 14, his maius imperium (highest authority to command) power over the province of Judea was actually exercised from the time he was named co-princeps with Augustus in AD 13. And this, in keeping with his recognition of the status of Annas as a de facto high priest, appears to be how Luke reckoned Tiberius’ 15th year, from AD 13 rather than 14..
Lanser, 2019.
So, Tiberius’ authority over the Roman province of Judea began in 13 CE upon his appointment as co-princepts. For Luke, this perspective defined his first year. The first year of Tiberius was 13 CE (766 AUC) making his fifteenth year 27 CE (780 AUC).
The Senate confirmed Tiberius, Augustus’ adopted son, princeps on September 18, 14 CE. Tiberius Caesar ruled as co-princeps for one year and then as sole Roman emperor 14-37 CE (766-790 AUC). For Luke to cite “in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar” (Luke 3:1 NASB) shows he reckoned the reign of Tiberius in Syria-Palestine beginning with Augustus’ appointment of Tiberius as co-princeps. This is consistent with the antedating of the rule of Herod’s sons Archelaus, Antipas, and Philip to 4 BCE following Herod’s death in 1 BCE. The independent reigns of Herod’s three sons began in 1 BCE. Antedating and inclusive reckoning were a common practice in the ancient world. These data rule out both 30 CE and 33 CE as possible dates for the Crucifixion.
These data falsify the premise of either 30 (as it is too early) and 33 CE (as it is too late) as the year of the Crucifixion and confirm the year of Jesus’ crucifixion in 31 CE.
3. The 46th Year of Temple Reconstruction
The New Cycle Sabbatic year count began with Tishri 1, 3229 AM (Mon., Sept. 20 in 533Ti/532Ti BCE). See New Cycle Jubilee & Sabbatical Years. This places 37Ti/36Ti BCE (3725 AM) as a Sabbatic year. Josephus held that:
…on the hundred eighty and fifth olympiad, on the third month, on the solemnity of the fast [the Day of Atonement], as if a periodical revolution of calamities had returned since that which befell the Jews under Pompey; for the Jews were taken by him on the same day, and this was after twenty-seven years’ time. (bracketed insertion mine).
Josephus, Antiquities 14.16.4§§487-488); Whiston, 1987, pp. 396-397.
By the Attic calendar, or Athenian calendar, a year in an Olympiad ran from Hekatombaion (Ἑκατομβαιών), July/August, through Skirophorion (Σκιροφοριών), June/July. Jerusalem fell on the Day of Atonement, Tishri 10, 3725 AM (Oct. 5, 37 BCE), in the month of Boedromion, the third month, in the fourth year (37Ti/36Ti BCE) of the 185th Olympiad, to Marc Anthony and Herod when priestly Course 23 (Delaiah) was on duty. Antigonus’ execution fell soon thereafter. This places the first regnal year of Herod the Great as 37Ti/36Ti BCE. Josephus reports in Herod’s seventh regnal year (31Ti/30Ti BCE) that:
At this time it was that the fight happened at Actium, between Octavius Caesar and Antony, in the seventh year of the reign of Herod and then it was also that there was an earthquake in Judea, such a one as had not happened at any other time, and which earthquake brought a great destruction upon the cattle in that country.
Josephus, Antiquities 15.5.2§121), (Whiston, 1987, p. 405); (cf. Josephus, Wars 1.19.3§370), Whiston, 1987, p. 572).
The Battle of Actium occurred September 2, 31 BCE in 31Ti/30Ti BCE (3730 AM) about three weeks before the Sabbatic year 30Ti/29Ti BCE. These data confirm Herod’s first regnal year in the Sabbatic year 37Ti/36Ti BCE (3725 AM).
However, Josephus reports that:
When he had done these things, he died, the fifth day after he had caused Antipater to be slain; having reigned, since he had procured Antigonus to be slain, thirty-four years; but since he had been declared king by the Romans, thirty-seven.
Josephus, Antiquities 17.8.1§191 (Whiston, 1987, p. 464); (cf. Josephus, Wars 1.33.8§665); (Whiston, 1987, p. 596).
The de facto reign of Herod the Great was 37 years beginning with his literally becoming king at the death of Antigonus which ended Hasmonaean rule. The 34 years refers to the independent reign of Herod to the point he gave his son Herod Archelaus royal status and authority in 4Ti/3Ti BCE. Later, Augustus, permitted the antedating of the reigns his sons Archelaus, Antipas, and Philip to 4Ti/3Ti BCE. This accounts for Joseph giving Herod a 34 year reign as well as a 37 year reign. This explanation will not satisfy some, but it is the only explanation constant with the birth of Jesus of Nazareth in 4 BCE and remain consistent with the chronology of the New Testament text.
Josephus also pointed out that in the final assault on Jerusalem on the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur) “the Jews were taken by him [Pompey] on the same day, and this was after twenty-seven years’ time” (bracketed insertion mine); (Josephus, Antiquities 14.16.4§487), (Whiston, 1987, p. 397). Nadav Sharon writing in the Jewish Studies Quarterly in his analysis “The Conquests of Jerusalem by Pompey and Herod: On Sabbath or ‘Sabbath of Sabbaths’?” notes the “lack of evidence for resistance by the besieged” Sharon, 2014, p. 219.
In this context, Herod the Great secured the title “King of the Jews” from the Roman Senate in 40 BCE, and with the aid of Roman military support, then secured his position in 37 BCE, ending Hasmonean rule. This defines his first year as 37Ni/36Ni CE, beginning Nisan 1, 37 BCE, as the reign of Antigonus officially ended on Nisan 1, 37 BCE.
At the time of the first Passover of Jesus’ ministry, Jesus came to the Temple and drove out the money changers and merchants. At that point, reconstruction of the Temple begun by Herod the Great had lasted 46 years (John 2:20). Josephus recorded that Herod the Great began its reconstruction in the 18th year of his reign (Josephus, Antiquities 15.11.1§380); (Whiston, 1987, p. 423). See A Short Chronology of Jesus’ Life.
The 18th eighteenth regal year of Herod’s reign was 20Ti/19Ti BCE or 3742 AM. This necessitates the 46th year of reconstruction to be 27Ti/28Ti BCE or 3788 AM. This places the first Passover of Jesus’ 3½ ministry in 28 CE; one he began around age 30 (Luke 3:23). Three years later, in 31 CE, on his visit for the Passover of his crucifixion, he cleansed the Temple for the second time (Matthew 21:12-13; Mark 11:15-17; Luke 19:45-46).
These data rule out 30 and 33 CE as the year of the Crucifixion and confirm Jesus’ crucifixion in 31 CE.
4. Jesus’ Visit to the Synagogue at Nazareth
The only Sabbatic year during Jesus ministry fell in 27Ti/28Ti CE (see New Cycle Jubilee & Sabbatical Years). In the first year of his ministry, Jesus came to Nazareth and went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day, as was his custom, on the Jewish high day of Shavuoth (Pentecost), and stood up to read (Luke 4:16). The Greek text reads τῇ τε ἡμέρᾳ τῶν σαββάτων (tē hēmera tōn sabbatōn) meaning “the Day of the Sabbaths or Weeks.”
This was no ordinary weekly Sabbath or high Sabbath. Jesus read from a passage in Isaiah describing the mission of the Messiah and thereby defining the mission statement of his ministry. Luke’s Gospel records:
And He came to Nazareth, where He had been br ought up; and as was His custom, He entered the synagogue on the Sabbath, and stood up to read. And the scroll of Isaiah the prophet was handed to Him. And He unrolled the scroll and found the place where it was written:
“The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me,
Because He anointed Me to bring good news to the poor.
He has sent Me to proclaim release to captives,
And recovery of sight to the blind,
To set free those who are oppressed,
To proclaim the favorable year of the Lord.”And He rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant, and sat down; and the eyes of all the people in the synagogue were intently directed at Him.
Luke 4:16-20 NASB
The reading, Jesus’ comments, and the inherent symbolism embodied restoration by God’s delivery of His people from the slavery of sin through the Lord’s anointed places this event on Pentecost in the Sabbatic year 27Ti/28Ti CE (3788 AM) the first year of Jesus 3½ years of ministry. This rules out both 30 CE as to early and 33 CE too late for either the Sabbatic year or the first year of Jesus’ ministry.
5. The Second-First Sabbath
The Apostle John identified three distinct Passovers during Jesus’ ministry (the 1st, 3rd, and 4th) and alluded to a fourth (the 2nd) as follows:
- He referred to the first Passover of Jesus’ ministry by “The Passover of the Jews was near, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem” (John 2:13 NASB).
- John does not explicitly identify the second Passover of Jesus’ ministry, but rather alludes to it at John 5:1 when it was yet future. He says, “After these things there was a feast of the Jews, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem” (John 5:1 NASB).
- As to the third Passover, John writes, “Now the Passover, the feast of the Jews, was near” (John 6:4 NASB).
- Of Jesus’ fourth and last Passover, he writes, “Jesus, therefore, six days before the Passover, came to Bethany where Lazarus was, whom Jesus had raised from the dead” (John 12:1 NASB).
In context, John 5:1 establishes that when a feast of the Jews approached Jesus went up to Jerusalem. He then explains what happened when Jesus arrived. Encountering a crippled man near the sheep’s pool, Jesus healed him on a Sabbath, σάββατον (sabbaton), and at John 5:10 he again identifies that Sabbath as being a feast day, Σάββατόν (sabbaton). Juan Mateos shows that the Sabbath of John 5:9 was a feast day or annual Sabbath as follows:
The strange constructions of Jn. 5:9 (Ἦν δὲ σάββατον ἐν ἐκείνῃ τῇ ἡμέρᾳ) and Jn. 9:14 (ἦν δὲ σάββατον ἐν ᾗ ἡμέρᾳ) do not allow the translation, “that day was the sabbath,” but rather, “that was a preceptual day,” being that it was a feast day (Jn 5:1: ἦν ἑορτὴ τῶν Ἰουδαίων). The meaning of σάββατov in these texts corresponds, therefore, to that of the Hebrew term šabbatôn.
Mateos, 1990, p. 20 (unpublished translation).
The feast day or annual Sabbath at John 9:14 mentioned by Mateos was the Last Great Day (the last of the seven annual holydays) at Jerusalem. It was a double Sabbath (both weekly and annual) occurring October 7, 30 CE (Tishri 22, 3791 AM). The task then becomes one of identifying which feast day was the annual Sabbath of John 5:9.
This we learn by identifying the feast day recorded by Luke at Luke 6:1. Using the parlance of his time, Luke referred to this annual Sabbath as the second-first Sabbath, translated into English as the second Sabbath of first rank or second-foremost Sabbath. Jews or Judeo-Christians, as both groups observed the weekly and annual Sabbaths in the Apostolic Age, reading Luke’s Gospel would have known to which Sabbath day Luke referred.
In context, following the events of John 5:1-47, John discusses the feeding of the 5,000 by multiplying on the east side of Lake Tiberius. This event as described at Matthew 14:13-21 says, “about five thousand men who ate, besides women and children” (Matthew 14:21 NASB). Mark’s Gospel reports the parallel account at Mark 6:33-41. Luke’s Gospel describes this at Luke 9:12-17.
Matthew 12:1-8; Mark 2:23-28; and Luke 6:1-5 precede the passages telling of the feeding of about 5,000 men plus women and children. These passages unmistakably record the details of Jesus’ activity occurring on a feast day (John 5:2-47) immediately followed by the second annual Sabbath feast day (Luke 6:1-5; Mark 2:23-28; Matthew 2:1-8). Here we see the first annual Sabbath (Nisan 15) followed by the second annual Sabbath (Nisan 21).
This identifies the feast of the Jews at John 5:1 as the Feast of Unleavened Bread and the second Passover of Jesus’ ministry. This eight-day festival in 29 CE, April 16-23 (Nisan 14-21), included the Passover and the Days of Unleavened Bread.
These data show the feast of the Jews at John 5:1 was the second Passover of Jesus’ ministry in the series of four. As the first year of Jesus ministry was 27/28 CE, the presence of four Passovers confirms 31 CE and rules out 30 CE as the year of the Crucifixion. See The Herodian Period.
6. Arrival of Pilate
In 27 CE, Emperor Tiberius appointed Pontius Pilate both procurator and prefect of the Roman provinces of Judaea, Samaria and Idumea. Pilate became the fifth governor of the Roman province of Judaea, serving under Tiberius for 10 years (Josephus, Antiquities 18.4.2§89); (Whiston, 1987, p. 482). According to British numismatist and naturalist H. Noel Humphreys (1807–1879),
The first procurators of Judaea were not allowed a very lengthened enjoyment of office, and in the year 26 or 27 A.D., Gratus, the fifth procurator, was superseded by Pontius Pilatus, who was appointed by Tiberius, in the year 27 A.D., and held the office for ten years. The provincial coins issued by these successive procurators may be assigned to each by the aid of the Actian date, and specimens bearing Actian dates between the years 58 and 68 of that era may be considered to have been issued under the auspices of Pontius Pilate. Pilatus, as is well known, was deposed for peculation and other abuses of power, in the last year of the reign of Tiberius, 37 A.D., and died in exile.
Humphreys H. N., 1864, p. 339.
By Josephus’ dating, using Hebrew ecclesiastical years (not civil AM years) and the inclusive reckoning of the era, the first year of Pilate’s administration extended from March 27 (Nisan 1), 37 CE through March 15 (Adar I 29), 28 CE. This means that Pilate’s arrival at Caesarea could have been anytime within his first year and yet have credit as governor for the full year.
His arrival from Rome appears to have occurred in the fall, just before the Mediterranean sailing season ended in late October. Upon taking up residence at Caesarea, Pilate dispatched the unit of Roman soldiers who had accompanied him on his journey from Rome to their assigned winter quarters in Jerusalem. The unit marched into Jerusalem at night with their decorated standards on full display. This provoked a confrontation. The context in Josephus infers the billeting of the Roman soldiers at Jerusalem occurred shortly after Pilate’s arrival at Caesarea, suggests this incident took place in November of 27 CE. As Josephus related the event, the details are consistent with a fall arrival of Pilate at Judea.
Pilate’s administration ended in the fall of 36 CE, in his 10th and final year (March 17, 36 CE – March 7, 37 CE) when the Roman Syrian legate Lucius Vitellius relieved him of his responsibilities. Vitellius arrived in Judaea towards the end of 36 CE, suspended Pilate for the abuse of power, and ordered him to Rome for trial before Tiberius. Vitellius appointed Marcellus as an interim caretaker. Marullus later replaced Marcellus.
By November, sailing on the Mediterranean became unsafe, suggesting Pilate remained in Judaea following his removal until sailing resumed. The departure of Pilate from Judea was most likely in February of 37 CE. Pilate arrived in Rome after Tiberius’ death on March 16, 37 CE.
In this context, John the Baptist, aged 30, began his ministry at Passover time in 27 CE, “in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea” (Luke 3:1-2 NASB).
In the summer of 27 CE, John baptized Jesus of Nazareth, who then began his “forty days and forty nights” fast (Matthew 4:2). At the time, Jesus was within his 30th year (inclusive dating) during Hebrew civil year 3786 AM (26Ti/27Ti CE). The first Passover of Jesus’ ministry, at age 30, then fell in 28 CE.
These data show John the Baptist began his ministry in 27 CE a few days after Pontus Pilate began his term on March 27 (Nisan 1), 27 CE, as procurator and prefect of the Roman provinces of Judaea, Samaria and Idumea. These data further confirm the baptism of Jesus in the late spring or early summer of 27 CE while Jesus was 29 years old (in his 30th year) and defines the first year of Jesus’ ministry as 27Ti/28Ti CE. This is in accord with a 31 CE Crucifixion after three and a half years and eliminates 30 and 33 CE as Crucifixion dates.
7. The Lunar Eclipse at the Crucifixion
According to NASA, there was a partial lunar eclipse on Wed., April 25, 31 CE and on Fri., April 3, 33 CE. There was no lunar eclipse at Passover time on either March 26, 31 CE or April 5, 30 CE. The lunar eclipse closest to Passover (Nisan 14) in 30 CE fell on Sun., June 4, 30 CE (Sivan 15). The NASA Catalog of Solar Eclipses show none at Passover time in 30, 31 or 33 CE. NASA reports solar eclipses on May 21, 30 CE, May 10, 31 CE, and March 19, 33 CE all too late for any correlation with the Crucifixion.
At Acts 2:17-21, the Apostle Peter quotes Joel 2:28-32. According to Anthony Alfieri, the Apostle Peter in Acts 2 upheld, at the very least, that the night following the Crucifixion included a partial lunar eclipse and a blood red moon. If, indeed, Peter conveyed that thought, then he confirms 31 CE and not 30 CE as the year of the Crucifixion.
The Year of the Crucifixion was 31 CE
All seven events, expelling of the Sanhedrin from the Hewn Stone-Chamber (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 41:2), the 46th Year of Temple Reconstruction, the Fifteenth Year of Tiberius, Jesus’ Visit to the Synagogue at Nazareth, the Second-First Sabbath, (Luke 3:1) (Luke 6:1),the arrival of Pilate, and the Lunar Eclipse at the Crucifixion ( Acts 2:17-21) all point to and collectively confirm 31 CE as the year of the Crucifixion.
The question then becomes, how are these data consistent with the Hebrew Perpetual Calendar which places Passover (Nisan 14) on Mon., Mar. 26 in 31 CE? The answer to that important question is the topic of my May 1 post – Dating the Crucifixion (Part 2).
Use the LEAVE A REPLY box below to comment on this post.
Recent Comments